posted by admin at 5:36 am
According to a study by the RAND Corporation, high-deductible plans do, in fact, lower healthcare spending.
However, these plans also have the effect of reducing preventative care–like immunizations and cancer screenings–which likely has downstream costs. So, it seems, there really is no free lunch.
posted by admin at 8:08 pm
This article from Politico suggests that they finally are. Although they’ve been promised many times before, this time it seems like the real thing.
Now the question is: other than lawyers, who (in the near term, at least) stands to gain from their release?
posted by admin at 6:25 am
In this “tell all” interview from the NYTimes a former healthcare insurance exec answers questions about health insurance. Interesting throughout.
posted by admin at 6:01 am
For as long as I can remember advocates of patient safety have both held the–very safe–aviation industry up as a useful analogue to health care.
But this blog entry in the WSJ calls the analogy into question. At least it calls into question the simple (simplistic) imitation of the practices of aviation that are commonly seen as solutions to many patient safety problems in health care.
posted by admin at 6:16 am
A friend of ours is caring for a 13-year old boy from Haiti who is seriously injured.
Here’s his blog:
posted by admin at 5:57 am
This article in the WSJ (not sure if it’s behind pay wall) reports the following.
The Obama administration next week will embark on a fresh pitch for the health-care overhaul, seeking to boost public support for the law on its one-year anniversary.
But lawmakers and some policy experts say the next phase of the overhaul will be more difficult to sell. Between now and the 2012 presidential election, few consumer-oriented changes kick in. That gives the administration few tools to break a deadlock in public opinion over President Barack Obama’s top domestic achievement, which he signed March 23, 2010.
Some polls show that 66% of people have no idea how the law will affect them. Looks like the White House has its work cut out for it.
posted by admin at 5:47 am
Kaiser’s news feed has an interesting article about so-called “Accountable Care Organizations,” (ACOs) which to date remain mysterious.
First, it needs to be said that NO ONE knows what ACOs are or will look like. There has been a pilot, which was quite successful. But CMS was set to clarify regs for ACOs and has missed the deadline. And there’s little indication when the guidelines will emerge.
Second, I’ve heard policy analysts report that the one most important thing for success in ACOs is “culture.” I really didn’t see that coming; yet it makes perfect sense.
Finally, ACOs–to date–are focused on docs and their behavior. The article I link to above argues that patients ought to be included in ACOs. Healthy behaviors can, the authors rightly mention, be part of the ACO calculation.
Nevertheless, I’m not sure how CMS can share gains in this way. It’s an interesting idea. And, in my view, shows promise.
posted by admin at 6:22 am
The Los Angeles Times reports that tele-monitoring of patients was not as successful as hoped.
Part of the problem is that the program relied on adding work to patients’ own health maintenance regimes. Or more simply put, it required a change in behavior and habits for patients.
Habits govern a great deal of our lives, so this result is not surprising.
But the article has some good news. There may be technologies that allow docs to monitor heart patients’ health status. Now if we can just get docs to change their habits….
posted by admin at 6:07 am
The Dartmouth Atlas issued a report on end-of-life care in some cancer patients.
The long and short of the paper is–from my limited perspective–that hospice is underutilized. My experience is that among clinicians, there are common misconceptions about what hospice organizations do. (Most people think hospice cuts off other treatment programs and/or as merely palliative care–pain management &c.) Even granting these misunderstandings, hospice care is still not being provided as often as it could (should) be. As the Atlas points out, many patients are dying in hospitals, rather than more nurturing environments.
Much of what hospice organizations do is alleviate caregiver overburden, help family/loved ones to prepare for and deal with the consequences of someone’s passing–everything from support groups to helping people get paperwork in order.
My experience is that hospice organizations are doing some of the most effective and important work in healthcare. Oh, and hospice care is often more cost-effective than other benefits to patients with terminal diagnoses.
posted by admin at 5:44 am
This article from Politico.com mentions the high cost of the 5% sickest patients. They are, in fact, the most costly patients to care for.
But I have a question about regression to the mean (and perhaps exiting the system–aka, death). Isn’t it the case that the sickest 5% of patients are likely not to be the 5% sickest patients next year, simply because of regression to the mean?